New Zealand 'A' Women in Australia, 2001/02, 3rd Match
Australian Youth Women v New Zealand 'A' Women
Caulfield Cricket Ground, Melbourne
13 February 2002 (50-over match)
Result: Australian Youth Women won by 15 runs
Series: Australian Youth Women leads the 4-match series 3-0
Toss: Australian Youth Women
Umpires:
Players per side: 12 (11 bat, 11 field)
Australian Youth Women innings (50 overs maximum) R M B 4 6
M Bulow c Corbin b King 14 45 44 1 0
*LC Sthalekar c McNeill b King 6 27 28 0 0
K Britt b Corbin 10 29 24 0 0
TE Brown c Flannery b Corbin 10 38 33 1 0
AJ Blackwell c Flannery b Mason 4 17 18 0 0
KM Applebee c Travers b King 14 56 46 0 0
+LA Coleman c Browne b Mason 19 49 45 1 0
ML White c Pulford b McNeill 7 17 16 0 0
B Matheson st Travers b McNeill 14 29 28 1 0
SJ Andrews not out 4 19 11 0 0
LK Ebsary c sub (LE Milliken) b Browne 4 5 4 1 0
Extras (lb 2, w 8, nb 3) 13
Total (all out, 48 overs) 119
DNB: CI Smith.
FoW: 1-14 (Sthalekar), 2-34 (Bulow), 3-40 (Britt),
4-45 (Blackwell), 5-55 (Brown), 6-88 (Applebee),
7-88 (Coleman), 8-100 (White), 9-114 (Matheson),
10-119 (Ebsary).
Bowling O M R W
Scripps 6 1 15 0 (2nb, 2w)
Browne 8 3 16 1 (3w)
Corbin 10 1 19 2 (1nb, 1w)
King 8 1 28 3 (2w)
McNeill 9 1 21 2
Mason 7 1 18 2
New Zealand 'A' Women innings (target: 120 runs from 50 overs) R M B 4 6
PB Flannery run out 27 119 117 0 0
VJ Brown run out 6 22 15 0 0
NM Thessman c Smith b Sthalekar 8 56 50 0 0
KL Pulford c Andrews b Matheson 12 47 39 0 0
AL Mason run out 1 4 3 0 0
MF Fahey not out 17 49 46 0 0
FS King c & b Sthalekar 0 17 15 0 0
N Scripps st Coleman b Matheson 4 8 9 0 0
NJ Browne not out 14 19 16 1 0
Extras (b 1, lb 3, w 10, nb 1) 15
Total (7 wickets, 50 overs) 104
DNB: AM Corbin, BH McNeill, *+EA Travers.
FoW: 1-16 (Brown), 2-44 (Thessman), 3-60 (Flannery),
4-62 (Mason), 5-62 (Pulford), 6-68 (King), 7-76 (Scripps).
Bowling O M R W
Smith 10 6 15 0 (1w)
Ebsary 4 1 8 0 (1w)
White 4 0 12 0 (4w)
Andrews 10 3 14 0 (1nb)
Sthalekar 10 4 13 2
Matheson 10 3 29 2 (3w)
Brown 2 0 9 0 (1w)
Note: Wides count as Balls Faced in the batsmens' analyses
No comments:
Post a Comment