Cricinfo International Scores

Nervous nineties is the period of batsman's innings when his or her score is between 90 and 99. During this phase many players bat extremely cautiously in order to avoid being out before they obtain a century.

Tuesday, February 1, 2000

3rd ODI: Australia v England at Bowral, 1 Feb 2000

ODI # 310
England Women in Australia, 1999/00, 3rd Women's One-Day International
Australia Women v England Women
Bradman Oval, Bowral
1 February 2000 (50-over match)

Result: Australia Women won by 10 wickets
Series: Australia Women leads the 4-Women's ODI series 3-0

Toss: Australia Women
Umpires: JA Evans and KJ Pye
Player of the Match: BJ Clark

England Women innings (50 overs maximum)                        R   M   B  4 6
CJ Connor c & b Mason 4 7 6 1 0
*K Smithies b McGregor 19 76 54 2 0
BA Daniels b Mason 4 1 2 1 0
CM Edwards b Fitzpatrick 10 31 31 0 0
KM Leng c Rolton b Smith 24 96 86 0 0
LK Newton st Price b Smith 4 23 23 0 0
+J Cassar st Price b Smith 7 29 32 0 0
MA Reynard lbw b Mason 5 28 23 1 0
D Holden c Rolton b Fahey 2 7 9 0 0
CE Taylor b Mason 10 16 14 0 0
KV Winks not out 1 2 4 0 0
Extras (lb 2, w 11, nb 3) 16
Total (all out, 45.5 overs, 162 mins) 106

FoW: 1-5 (Connor, 1.3 ov), 2-9 (Daniels, 1.5 ov),
3-30 (Edwards, 10.6 ov), 4-47 (Smithies, 21.1 ov),
5-67 (Newton, 28.3 ov), 6-81 (Cassar, 36.5 ov),
7-86 (Leng, 38.4 ov), 8-89 (Holden, 41.2 ov),
9-103 (Reynard, 45.2 ov), 10-106 (Taylor, 45.5 ov).

Bowling O M R W
Fitzpatrick 8 2 21 1
Mason 7.5 2 27 4 (3nb, 3w)
McGregor 10 4 12 1 (2w)
Fahey 10 3 27 1 (2w)
Smith 10 2 17 3

Australia Women innings (target: 107 runs from 50 overs) R M B 4 6
LM Keightley not out 38 83 74 4 0
*BJ Clark not out 66 83 79 8 0
Extras (lb 1, w 2, nb 1) 4
Total (0 wickets, 24.5 overs, 83 mins) 108

DNB: C Bambury, KL Rolton, J Broadbent, CL Fitzpatrick,
+JC Price, CL Mason, TA McGregor, AJ Fahey, CR Smith.

Bowling O M R W
Taylor 6 2 19 0
Newton 6 0 25 0 (1nb, 2w)
Holden 3 0 16 0
Connor 6 1 17 0
Reynard 2 0 18 0
Leng 1.5 0 12 0

Note: Wides count as Balls Faced in the batsmens' analyses

No comments:

Blog Archive